Category Archives: politics

Vote!

I’m going to say this only once: if you value your middle-class lifestyle, America’s reputation in the world, and your personal safety from terrorism, register NOW, and vote for John Kerry in November.

No, I don’t believe that John Kerry’s a saint, nor that George Bush is the devil – they’re all politicians, everybody is in somebody’s pocket, and every election I’ve voted in has been a choice of the lesser of two evils. But it’s still a choice and, if you’re an American voter, it is your responsibility to yourself, your country, and the REST OF THE WORLD to make that choice.

George Bush’s radical religious beliefs and cultural naivete’ have taken America from a position of great vulnerability (September 11th happened, after all) to one of even greater danger and vulnerability. We are not safer than we were – far less so, and anyone who tells you otherwise is playing you for a fool.

No single person or country will be able to fix the current world situation in a hurry; it will not get fixed at all without global cooperation. Kerry’s got a better chance of obtaining that than Bush.

As for the economy, there are no quick fixes. What it needs is long-term investment in human capital: a top-to-bottom reform of the American education system. America turns out some of the worst-educated high school graduates in the world, not fit for anything but flipping hamburgers. That’s why the country is losing its competitive edge in the world, and protectionism will not help.

As for the campaign ads, speeches, etc., I suggest that you ignore them. Nothing of substance is being said. Both parties believe that a political campaign is entertainment for the ignorant masses, who (they believe) are easily swayed by words and images that appeal to the emotions (negative ones more often than positive). They’re not telling you anything useful about who they themselves are or what they will do once in office.

There is a slim hope that they might do so during the debates. But a political ad is just that – an advertisement, to get you to buy the product: “Why I’m better than Brand X” (or why Brand X is the anti-Christ). The Republicans are business people, and very, very good at marketing. But, as a sophisticated 21st century consumer, you know very well that the ad has little to do with the product – are you gonna buy that just because some Madison Avenue ad-man tells you to?

Media coverage is almost as ludicrous as what the parties themselves are spouting. Watch “The Daily Show” – at least that’s played for laughs, whereas Fox News doesn’t even realize that it’s a parody of journalism.

Oh, and one more thing: Discussion is welcome. I don’t know what the world is coming to when it’s taboo to discuss politics in polite circles, for fear of giving offense or having an argument. I have friends and relatives who will probably vote Republican and, while deploring their taste and wishing to persuade them out of it, I don’t love or respect them any the less for that – even you, gentle reader, if you are determined to vote Republican. If Bush gets re-elected and the world goes even more to hell than it already has, at least I will have the bitter satisfaction of saying: “I told you so.”

 

Yesterday’s disingenuous quote from Dick Cheney: “It’s absolutely essential that eight weeks from today, on Nov. 2, we make the right choice, because if we make the wrong choice then the danger is that we’ll get hit again and we’ll be hit in a way that will be devastating from the standpoint of the United States.”

Dear Dick: You know as well as I do that the United States is in danger no matter WHO gets elected. Yes, there likely WILL be more attacks, and some of them may be devastating. You haven’t done much to alleviate that risk, in fact you’ve made it WORSE.


Further reading/viewing:

The Daily Show

In their new book, “The Bushes,” Peter and Rochelle Schweizer, who interviewed many Bushes, including the president’s father and his brother Jeb, quote one unnamed relative as saying that W. sees the war on terror “as a religious war”: “He doesn’t have a P.C. view of this war. His view of this is that they are trying to kill the Christians. And we the Christians will strike back with more force and more ferocity than they will ever know.” – Maureen Dowd, NYT, Apr 29, 2004

Their beliefs are bonkers, but they are at the heart of power

The Greeks

A few months ago we watched The Greeks, a PBS (American public television) series which I bought on DVD because Ross was studying ancient Greek history. From this account, it appears that the Athenians invented not only democracy, but also politics as we know it today.

The way PBS tells the tale, Themistocles, an Athenian who fought in the first war in which the Athenians trounced the numerically-superior Persians, expected that Persia would one day return to take revenge. All his fellow citizens were content to believe that, once beaten, the Persians would never be heard from again. When the Athenians stumbled upon a silver mine near their city, Themistocles wanted to use the unexpected windfall to build warships. But he knew that his fellow citizens didn’t take the Persian threat seriously, so he invented a different threat: he convinced them that they were in danger from a small neighboring state, and should build the world’s largest fleet of warships to use against those people.

The Athenians fell for it. They voted to built ships, and the fleet was completed just in time for the Persians’ return (and defeat at Salamis). So we have an early example of a politician tricking the voters into something that he believes is good for them. In this case, he was right. But, far more often, even politicians who start out with the finest intentions fall prey to the “anything to get re-elected” syndrome. And many (e.g. Italian prime minister Berlusconi) get into politics for motives having little to do with the civic good.

You might want to have a look at: The Buying of the President 2004: Who’s Really Bankrolling Bush and His Democratic Challengers–and What They Expect in Return by Charles Lewis

Where’s the Music?

I’m old enough to remember the late 60s/early 70s and the protests against the Vietnam war. I grew up singing protest songs, both rock and folk. So here we are, protesting again – but where’s the music? Michael Moore reportedly was upset because he couldn’t use The Who’s Won’t Get Fooled Again in “Fahrenheit 9/11,” so instead he used a tune by Neil Young, another aging rocker. Don’t any young musicians have anything to say?

Here’s a reminder from the Vietnam era; I listened to this while writing last week’s War is Virtual Hell piece.

“I want to thank you, sergeant, for the help you’ve been to me.

You’ve taught me how to kill and how to hate the enemy.

And I know that I’ll be ready when they march me off to war,

And I know that it won’t matter that I’ve never killed before.”

Tom Paxton, The Willing Conscript

War is Virtual Hell

I’ve seen Michael Moore’s Farenheit 9/11. Very disturbing in so many ways that I won’t go into – whether you agree with Moore or you don’t, this film is not likely to change your mind. But one thing in particular, peripheral to Moore’s arguments, jumped out at me.

The film shows an American TV ad recruiting people for the national guard. The ad uses computer-generated characters, both men and women, looking very heroic and Lara Croft-ish as they morph between uniforms and street clothes, handling high-tech equipment, flying planes, etc.. Elsewhere in the film, Moore interviews tank soldiers in Iraq, who describe with gusto how their tanks have music systems which allow them to pipe music right into their helmets. “We put this disc on” (showing a black CD with white print, couldn’t quite see the name), “it really gets the adrenaline pumping.”

These two scenes seem to show that the US military is training its people to treat war as a video game – complete with soundtrack! You can roll along a Baghdad street, guns blazing, and not even realize that those are real people you’re killing.

But real people do die, on both sides, and several of the soldiers Moore interviewed commented on how grim and grisly the reality was. Had no one told them, in all their training to kill, what dead bodies look like?

Corruption

I went to hear Gary Hart, former US senator and (also former) Democratic presidential candidate, speak in Milan at the Istituto per gli Studi di Politica Internazionale. His lecture was brief and intelligent, ostensibly about “American Foreign Policy after the election,” but in many ways a plug for his good friend John Kerry.

He raised a number of interesting and important points, such as the fact that there has as yet been no real public debate in America on what its role should be in the post-Cold War world. Some scholars and others see the US as already being, or moving into the role of, an empire. Can or should the US be a “benign” empire (if such a thing is possible)? Can a country be both an empire and a republic? (Hart and many others say no.)

Hart says that the values and behaviors of a republic, as America was founded to be, include popular sovereignty and resistance to corruption (corruption in the broad sense of “putting personal interest ahead of the common good”). On both of these counts, America already fails to be a republic: voter turnout is among the world’s lowest, so we cannot say that we have “popularly” elected representatives. And no one seems to be putting the common good above personal interest. Hart rightly points to the corruption in political financing: virtually all money for political candidates comes from interest groups. But, in fairness, I can’t say that the Democrats score any better on this scale than the Republicans – the Democratic candidates are simply in a different set of pockets and, when it’s their turn in power, will make paybacks to a different set of interests.

Had I been registered as a Republican in 2000, I would have voted for John McCain in the primaries, because I liked what he had to say about campaign finance reform. In the event, all I could do was vote for Gore, who is owned by slightly less evil interest groups. I don’t like what the teachers’ unions have done to American education, but I like even less what Cheney’s pals at Halliburton are doing to the world. For the record, I am disgusted enough with Bush & Co. that I have recently joined the Milan chapter of Democrats Abroad, and will be doing my bit by helping out with their website.

However, I have the despairing feeling that it’s going to be a long time before either party fields a candidate I can actually respect. If you want to see someone trying to make a real difference in American politics, have a look at John Bonifaz and his organization.

John and I were in India together on our study abroad year in Benares. We didn’t like each other then, and have hardly met since, but, through the grapevine, I’ve been aware of what he’s been up to, and have come to respect him greatly – his heart and mind are both in the right place, and he’s very, very intelligent in how he pursues his goals. A few years ago he was thinking of running for office in Massachusetts – against John Kerry – and I pledged money to his campaign (for the first time in my political life); unfortunately, he bowed out after 9/11, though he still has a few things to say to Kerry.

John’s got a new book out which may interest some of you (others will hate it <grin>): Warrior King: The Case for Impeaching George Bush.