Stuff I Do: dtrace.conf 2012

^ above: the famous DTrace laser pony designed by substack. Why a pony? Read here.

This week was eventful for me professionally. I organized and ran dtrace.conf 2012, a highly technical conference, for my employer and others of the tech community that works with this technology. Yes, this is the same DTrace as in that book that I edited in 2010.

I also filmed it and ran a live video stream, while publicizing it via Twitter. And making sure everyone got fed and, at the end of the day, had beer to drink. A very busy day, but all went very well. The final, edited video is now making its way to YouTube, see the playlist of videos above.

Who You Calling “Slut”?

“When you judge someone, it doesn’t define the person you’re judging – it defines you.”
Tulisa Contostavlos (story in The Guardian)

A few months ago I had a Twitter exchange with a woman in the tech industry, who wrote that girls the age of her teenage son should not be allowed dress like “skanks”. I assumed it was her son who defined them thus, and gently suggested that he should be taught not to use such terms. She replied that it was herself, not her son, who made this judgement. Her son, she added, being a teenager, was happy for them to dress that way.

I resisted the impulse to argue, because I may have to deal with this woman professionally someday. But it saddens and angers me that so many are prepared to pass judgement on other women based on their mode of dress and their (real or perceived) social and sexual comportment.

I’ve lived in places where women are judged far more harshly, and consequences for “transgression” can be severe. In Bangladesh, I was appalled that most of women on the street – and they were few – were covered head to toe in black burqas, only their eyes barely visible through black mesh. Though I was a skinny, innocent 14 year old, uninteresting to the average male gaze in my own country, in Bangladesh I didn’t feel safe, exposed to the eyes of men who assumed that any woman not completely covered up was somehow sexually available. So I dressed conservatively, by American standards (covered to the ankles – in tropical heat), and never went out alone.

Once I took a bicycle rickshaw somewhere with a woman friend. We were puzzled as to why the driver was pedaling so erratically, stopping and starting and weaving all over the road. We finally realized that he was masturbating furiously through his lunghi – apparently irresistibly turned on by the sight of our (not very) naked flesh – or by whatever fantasies and assumptions he entertained about unchaperoned foreign females. Had I or my friend been alone with him, we might have been in danger. By our own cultural norms we were modestly dressed: long skirts or trousers, loose, high-necked blouses. But those same clothes, in the eyes of the rickshaw driver, branded us as available sexual objects:  our hair, faces, and arms were uncovered! Obviously, we were sluts, and lucky that we got no worse than a display of public masturbation.

In some countries, particularly those under Islamic law, it’s considered sluttish behavior for a woman to ride in a car or speak with a man who is not a relative, and punishments can be severe. Many girls worldwide have been murdered by their own families for “dishonoring” them by falling in love with the “wrong” men.

So, to define a girl or woman as a “skank” or “slut” is not just insulting: it implies a threat of physical harm as punishment for her “transgressive” behavior. Even in America, how many times have we heard – even from authority figures – that a woman “deserved what she got” because she was in the wrong place, dressed the wrong way, behaved provocatively? When you call a woman a slut, you have judged and condemned her to… whatever she gets.

Most Americans reading this were probably shocked and disgusted at the rickshaw driver’s behavior I described, but your definition of “slut” comes from your culture, just as much as his did. I don’t necessarily agree with any of you. Actually: your right to have an opinion ends where my body begins.

If you think you’re more civilized or enlightened than that rickshaw driver was, then it’s time for you to stop judging girls and women based on their dress or sexual behavior. Who a woman has sex with is none of your damned business. The idea that it might be comes from the notion that women are property, whose ability to bear children must be kept safe for a socially-approved man.

Legally and culturally, most of the people likely to read this page should be well past that. It therefore follows that you should not be using words like “slut” to threaten, shame, control, and silence women. Or you’re really not so different from that illiterate, ignorant rickshaw driver on the streets of Bangladesh.

 

Thanks to Brendan for insightful comments during the writing of this piece.

further reading:

Learn Italian in Song: I Promessi Sposi in Dieci Minuti

The Betrothed, in 10 Minutes

I Promessi Sposi (The Betrothed), considered the first example of the modern novel in Italian (though the language is a bit antiquated today), is a story every educated Italian knows well, in part because they study it in school. We heard a lot about it in Lecco in particular because its author, Alessandro Manzoni, was the town’s most famous native son, and much of the action of the book takes place around Lecco and other parts of the Lake Como region, and in Milan.

Continue reading Learn Italian in Song: I Promessi Sposi in Dieci Minuti

Comcast: Customer Service Failure Before I’m Even a Customer

Here’s the email I sent to we_can_help@comcast.com this morning:

Two days ago I was looking for Internet and a phone line – and ONLY that – for my move to a new apartment next week. Your current special offer was acceptable, though I was not happy that it required a 2-year contract; it took some time with one of your online “analysts” to determine the cancellation fee in case I happen not to be in a Comcast service area after one year.I needed some other information, got that, and came back to the Comcast site yesterday knowing exactly what I wanted. I was forced to supply sensitive personal info (SSN) early in the process – why?I could not tell from the pages I saw whether professional installation would be needed. When the form directed me to an online analyst again, I assumed it would be to make an appointment for that. I had to wait ~5 mins to reach an analyst. I had started this process at the end of a long workweek, and it was taking much longer than I had anticipated.

The chat window closed my order page, so I could no longer see the shopping cart with charge details.

The analyst asked me for my SSN again – why?

I had selected the internet+phone only option. She tried to upsell me TV – twice. No doubt her script required it and I don’t blame her, but it was intensely annoying. If I had wanted TV, I’d have checked that box in the first place.

I don’t see why I needed to deal with a person at all, and I was left with the strong feeling that the only reason to force me to chat with a “live” person was this upsell opportunity.

She ran a credit check, which I found intrusive and unnecessary (aren’t I paying with a credit card anyway?), but I had no choice, apparently.

She informed me that there would be a $25 activation fee for the phone. I could no longer prove this, but I was fairly certain I had not seen that in the cost summary page I had been given before. When I got angr(ier), she offered to knock that down to $5.

She also insisted that I needed the $35 professional installation – which costs me not only $35, but time away from the office to wait for your technician.

I only need the phone line for the intercom/gate opening system on the new apt building. I know that such a system in my current complex works with an ADSL line, but she said this was not DSL (I didn’t think to ask if it was ADSL), and she could not find out (though she tried) whether your line will open the gate.

By this point I was feeling so manipulated and bullied by your process that I gave up. I told her I might come back to the process so to please leave it open so I would not have to go through 20 Questions with the next analyst.

Please delete all information you have about me now
– I have decided to use sonic.net. Their site and fees are straightforward, and much cheaper after year 1 than yours. They let me do everything online, I can use my own modem, and they encourage me to try the installation myself as “most of the time it works.” No credit check, no SSN required – they just took my credit card number.

In other words, they treat me like a competent adult and equal. Comcast’s process made me feel bullied, manipulated, and insulted.

Please confirm that you have deleted all my personal information from Comcast’s system. I do not wish to do business with you, and do not wish you to retain any information about me. Thank you.

Deirdré Straughan

Update June 12, 2013: Fifteen months later, I’m happy with Sonic.net. Had to call for support on installation and activation, and once after that. It was quickly, cheerfully, and competently supplied, without trying to sell me anything. Furthermore, as the EFF tells me, Sonic.net “has my back”. With all that’s been going on in government snooping on citizens, that’s worth something.

Meanwhile, Comcast (and ATT) clog my mailbox every week with offers for services that I told them both last year I would never want. Anyone know of a way to make this stop?

Deirdré Straughan on Italy, India, the Internet, the world, and now Australia